This Online City Moving Cost Calculator will assist you in calculating the cost of moving house from city to city. The purpose of this independent anonymous moving cost estimator is to provide you with a ballpark moving quote on what your long distance move is likely to cost. It is not associated with any moving companies. Accordingly, the only required fields are where you are moving from, and where you are moving to. Please enter the cities you are moving from and moving to, by entering the first few letters of your city name, and then selecting your city from the list. The form is dynamic - so will instantly update as you change the various options. Tip: Your quote will update dynamically whenever your change the residence type or select alternative options. Professional Boxing and Packing Service Imperial (US Standard Units) The form is dynamic, so once the cities that you are moving from and to have been entered above, then you will see the values in the estimate section dynamically updating as you change the form's parameters.

You can also check the Assumptions Section and make any necessary changes to ensure that these values are appropriate for your circumstances. Total Loading / Unloading Time Total Packing and Boxing Time The following map is provided to assist you with planning the logistics of your trip, and in determining the best route to take, places to stay etc, and even places of interest that you may wish to see along the way. *City Distance data provide by Geobytes. Remember that article I wrote about ducts installed against the roof deck and how I said it was probably the absolute worst single location for installing ducts?  Well, in the comments, Dave Roberts, a senior engineer at the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), wrote about a paper he co-authored last year and included a link to it. Up against the deck may be the worst place in the attic to install ducts, but Roberts shows that putting them in the attic at all is the worst place in the house you can install ducts.

The report, Ducts in the Attic? What Were They Thinking?, summarizes the research that's been done about putting ductwork in unconditioned attics and basically says it's about the stupidest thing we do in homes that do a lot of air conditioning. air conditioner and heater not turning onI encourage you to download and read this report. cheap home ac unitIf you're building or remodeling a home, make sure the general contractor (if it's not you) and the HVAC contractor get copies.how much do new ac units cost I love the analogy they use to introduce one of the main problems with this location. "Heat exchangers," they write, "are designed to transfer as much heat as possible from one fluid to another." Comparing this configuration to a solar water heater, they make the case that putting air conditioning ducts in a hot attic is an effective way to heat up the conditioned air as it travels from the air handler to the conditioned space inside the home.

If you've studied heat transfer at all, you may recall that the rate at which heat moves from a warmer to a cooler body depends on the temperature difference, which we abbreviate as ΔT. An attic can get up to about 130° F in the summer, and the conditioned air entering the ducts is about 55° F or so. With hundreds of square feet of ductwork surface area in the attic and a ΔT of 75° F, the air coming out of the vents in your home will be significantly higher than 55° F. Throw duct leakage into the mix, and the problems are even worse. What Roberts and his co-author Jon Winkler did, in addition to reviewing the literature about this topic, was to model the savings possible when you relocate the ducts from an unconditioned attic to the conditioned space inside the building envelope. They chose Houston, Phoenix, and Las Vegas as the locations for their modeled houses. The table below summarizes the main results. In addition to comparing ducts in the attic to ducts inside the building envelope, Roberts and Winkler also looked at electricity savings of other measures, such as adding insulation, installing better windows, and using higher efficiency air conditioners.

The table below shows that moving the ducts inside is the first thing you should do to save the amount of electricity you use. In addition to saving on air conditioning operating costs, the upfront cost of cooling equipment is lower in efficient homes. Roberts and Winkler looked at moving the ducts inside compared to other building envelope improvements, and again, moving the ducts inside beats all the other methods for achieving this objective, as shown below. This report, which the authors delivered at the ACEEE (American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy) Summer Study in August 2010, shows definitively that putting ducts in attics in cooling dominated climates is a practice that needs to end. Download the paper here: Ducts in the Attic? What Were They Thinking? heating & cooling distributionUnder the perpetual system the account is constantly (or perpetually) changing. When a retailer purchases merchandise, the retailer debits its Inventory account for the cost;

when the retailer sells the merchandise to its customers its Inventory account is credited and its account is debited for the cost of the goods sold. Rather than staying dormant as it does with the periodic method, the Inventory account balance is continuously updated. Under the perpetual system, two transactions are recorded when merchandise is sold: (1) the sales amount is debited to or and is credited to , and (2) the cost of the merchandise sold is debited to Cost of Goods Sold and is credited to Inventory. (Note: Under the periodic system the second entry is not made.) With perpetual FIFO, the first (or oldest) costs are the first moved from the Inventory account and debited to the Cost of Goods Sold account. The end result under perpetual FIFO is the same as under periodic FIFO. In other words, the first costs are the same whether you move the cost out of inventory with each sale (perpetual) or whether you wait until the year is over (periodic). Under the perpetual system the Inventory account is constantly (or perpetually) changing.

When a retailer purchases merchandise, the retailer debits its Inventory account for the cost of the merchandise. When the retailer sells the merchandise to its customers, the retailer credits its Inventory account for the cost of the goods that were sold and debits its Cost of Goods Sold account for their cost. Under the perpetual system, two transactions are recorded at the time that the merchandise is sold: (1) the sales amount is debited to Accounts Receivable or Cash and is credited to Sales, and (2) the cost of the merchandise sold is debited to Cost of Goods Sold and is credited to Inventory. With perpetual LIFO, the last costs available at the time of the sale are the first to be removed from the Inventory account and debited to the Cost of Goods Sold account. Since this is the perpetual system we cannot wait until the end of the year to determine the last cost—an entry must be recorded at the time of the sale in order to reduce the Inventory account and to increase the Cost of Goods Sold account.

If costs continue to rise throughout the entire year, perpetual LIFO will yield a lower cost of goods sold and a higher net income than periodic LIFO. Generally this means that periodic LIFO will result in less income taxes than perpetual LIFO. (If you wish to minimize the amount paid in income taxes during periods of inflation, you should discuss LIFO with your tax adviser.) Once again we'll use our example for the Corner Shelf Bookstore: Let's assume that after Corner Shelf makes its second purchase in June 2015, Corner Shelf sells one book. This means the last cost at the time of the sale was $89. Under perpetual LIFO the following entry must be made at the time of the sale: $89 will be credited to Inventory and $89 will be debited to Cost of Goods Sold. If that was the only book sold during the year, at the end of the year the Cost of Goods Sold account will have a balance of $89 and the cost in the Inventory account will be $351 ($85 + $87 + $89 + $90). If the bookstore sells the textbook for $110, its under perpetual LIFO will be $21 ($110 - $89).

Note that this is different than the gross profit of $20 under periodic LIFO.When a retailer purchases merchandise, the costs are debited to its Inventory account; when the retailer sells the merchandise to its customers the Inventory account is credited and the Cost of Goods Sold account is debited for the cost of the goods sold. Rather than staying dormant as it does with the periodic method, the Inventory account balance under the perpetual average is changing whenever a purchase or sale occurs. Under the perpetual system, two sets of entries are made whenever merchandise is sold: (1) the sales amount is debited to Accounts Receivable or Cash and is credited to Sales, and (2) the cost of the merchandise sold is debited to Cost of Goods Sold and is credited to Inventory. Under the perpetual system, "average" means the average cost of the items in inventory as of the date of the sale. This average cost is multiplied by the number of units sold and is removed from the Inventory account and debited to the Cost of Goods Sold account.

We use the average as of the time of the sale because this is a perpetual method. (Note: Under the periodic system we wait until the year is over before computing the average cost.) Let's use the same example again for the Corner Shelf Bookstore: Let's assume that after Corner Shelf makes its second purchase, Corner Shelf sells one book. This means the average cost at the time of the sale was $87.50 ([$85 + $87 + $89 + $89] ÷ 4]). Because this is a perpetual average, a journal entry must be made at the time of the sale for $87.50. The $87.50 (the average cost at the time of the sale) is credited to Inventory and is debited to Cost of Goods Sold. After the sale of one unit, three units remain in inventory and the balance in the Inventory account will be $262.50 (3 books at an average cost of $87.50). After Corner Shelf makes its third purchase, the average cost per unit will change to $88.125 ([$262.50 + $90] ÷ 4). As you can see, the average cost moved from $87.50 to $88.125—this is why the perpetual average method is sometimes referred to as the moving average method.